Avaliação da (in)flexibilidade psicológica na população portuguesa: Validação da versão breve do Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI-24)

Carina Pereira; Marina Cunha; Ilda Massano-Cardoso; Ana Galhardo

doi:10.31211/rpics.2023.9.1.285

Authors

Carina Pereira Instituto Superior Miguel Torga, Coimbra, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5339-112X
Marina Cunha Instituto Superior Miguel Torga; CINEICC – Centro de Investigação em Neuropsicologia e Intervenção Cognitivo-Comportamental – Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade de Coimbra https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5957-1903
Ilda Massano-Cardoso Instituto Superior Miguel Torga, Coimbra; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Coimbra; Centro de Estudos e Investigação em Saúde da Universidade de Coimbra (CEISUC) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2510-2348
Ana Galhardo Instituto Superior Miguel Torga; CINEICC – Centro de Investigação em Neuropsicologia e Intervenção Cognitivo-Comportamental – Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade de Coimbra https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3484-6683

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2023.9.1.285

Keywords:

Psychological Flexibility, Psychological inflexibility, Assessment, Factor structure, Psychometric validation, Quantitative study

Abstract

Objective: Translation and validation of the brief version of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI-24) for the Portuguese population. Methods: The sample consisted of 650 participants aged between 18 and 74 years. Participants completed an online protocol consisting of a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory-24 (MPFI-24), the Psy-Flex, the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), and the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF). Results: Confirmatory factor analysis of the MPFI-24 showed the plausibility of the two-factor higher-order model with six first-order Psychological Flexibility (PF) factors and six first-order Psychological Inflexibility (PI) factors. The MPFI-24 showed adequate reliability, with alpha values greater than .70 on the overall indices and on all factors. It also showed good temporal stability. The PF showed a positive association with psychological flexibility, as assessed by Psy-Flex, and with the perception of mental health (MHC-SF) and a negative association with negative emotional states (PHQ-4). PI revealed the opposite pattern, with all correlations being moderate and significant. Age showed a positive association with FP and a negative association with PI. No gender differences were found for the two global indicators. Conclusions: The MPFI-24 proved to be a valid and reliable inventory to assess PF and PI in adults from the Portuguese population. This instrument can be used in clinical and research contexts and can be a relevant contribution to the design of interventions aimed at increasing psychological flexibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arch, J. J., Fishbein, J. N., Finkelstein, L. B., & Luoma, J. B. (2022). Acceptance and commitment therapy processes and mediation: Challenges and how to address them. Behavior Therapy, In Press. https://doi.org/jz9f

Baker, L. D., & Christopher, C. R. (2022). Embracing complex models: Exploratory network analyses of psychological (in)flexibility processes and unique associations with psychiatric symptomology and quality of life. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 23, 64–74. https://doi.org/jz9g

Bennett, S. D., Bailey, K. A., Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B., Boswell, J. F., & Gallagher, M. W. (2021). The relationship between psychological flexibility and well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 19, 121–132. https://doi.org/jz9h

Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the acceptance and action questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42(4), 676–688. https://doi.org/ftbs23

Boulanger, J. L., Hayes, S. C., & Pistorello, J. (2010). Experiential avoidance as a functional contextual concept. Em A. M. Kring & D. M. Sloan (Eds.), Emotion regulation and psychopathology: A transdiagnostic approach to etiology and treatment (pp. 107–136). The Guilford Press.

Carraça, B., Serpa, S., Rosado, A., & Guerrero, J. P. (2019). A pilot study of a mindfulness-based program (MBSoccerP): The potential role of mindfulness, self-compassion and psychological flexibility on flow and elite performance in soccer athletes. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia del Ejercicio y el Deporte, 14(1), 34–40. https://bit.ly/3FdnVXi

Carvalho, J. S., Pinto, A. M., & Marôco, J. (2017). Results of a mindfulness-based social-emotional learning program on Portuguese elementary students and teachers: A quasi-experimental study. Mindfulness, 8(2), 337–350. https://doi.org/f9389k

Cunha, M., & Temido, A. (2022). Psy-Flex: Versão portuguesa [Manuscrito não publicado]. Instituto Superior Miguel Torga.

Dawson, D. L., & Golijani-Moghaddam, N. (2020). COVID-19: Psychological flexibility, coping, mental health, and wellbeing in the UK during the pandemic. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 17, 126–134. https://doi.org/gg6vvg

Doorley, J. D., Goodman, F. R., Kelso, K. C., & Kashdan, T. B. (2020). Psychological flexibility: What we know, what we do not know, and what we think we know. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/gmn79j

Eisinga, R., Te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637–642. https://doi.org/gckftn

Faulkner, J. W., Theadom, A., Mahon, S., Snell, D. L., Barker-Collo, S., & Cunningham, K. (2020). Psychological flexibility: A psychological mechanism that contributes to persistent symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury? Medical Hypotheses, 143, 110–141. https://doi.org/gk8xn9

Finney, S., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. Em G. Hancock & R. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269-314). Greenwich, Conn.: IAP.

Francis, A. W., Dawson, D. L., & Golijani-Moghaddam, N. (2016). The development and validation of the Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy processes (CompACT). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 5(3), 134–145. https://doi.org/gdj5ms

Galhardo, A., Cunha, M., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2019). A 7‐year follow‐up study of the Mindfulness‐Based Program for Infertility: Are there long‐term effects? Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 26, 409–417. https://doi.org/grk55s

Gámez, W., Chmielewski, M., Kotov, R., Ruggero, C., & Watson, D. (2011). Development of a measure of experiential avoidance: The multidimensional experiential avoidance questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 692–713. https://doi.org/cmgwhg

Gloster, A. T., Meyer, A. H., & Lieb, R. (2017). Psychological flexibility as a malleable public health target: Evidence from a representative sample. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6(2), 166–171. https://doi.org/gghm7f

Gloster, A. T., Block, V. J., Klotsche, J., Villanueva, J., Rinner, M. T. B., Benoy, C., Walter, M., Karekla, M., & Bader, K. (2021). Psy-Flex: A contextually sensitive measure of psychological flexibility. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 22, 13–23. https://doi.org/gm8zmk

Grégoire, S., Gagnon, J., Lachance, L., Shankland, R., Dionne, F., Kotsou, I., Monestès, J. L., Rolffs, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2020). Validation of the English and French versions of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory short form (MPFI-24). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 18, 99–110. https://doi.org/jz9k

Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., & Spielberger, C. D. (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. L. Erlbaum Associates.

Hayes, S. C. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy, 47(6), 869–885. https://doi.org/f9j3cm

Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/dp332g

Hayes, S. C., Pistorello, J., & Levin, M. E. (2013). Acceptance and commitment therapy as a unified model of behavior change. The Counseling Psychologist, 40(7), 976–1002. https://doi.org/gdj4s4

Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy. Em The process and practice of mindful change (2ª ed.). The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/bwnm

International Test Commission. (2010). International test commission guidelines for translating and adapting tests. https://www.intestcom.org

Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(4), 865–878. https://doi.org/dcp6p6

Keyes, C. L. M., & Brim, G. (2002). The mental health continuum: From anguishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Research, 43(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/cd5xms

Klaassen, F., de Groot, J., & van den Brink, E. (2021). The relationship between psychological flexibility and mental health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 19, 67–82. https://doi.org/gjjfxm

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (2ª ed.). The Guildford Press.

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/b84r

Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2009). An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: The PHQ-4. Psychosomatics, 50(6), 613–621. https://doi.org/dcmq53

Landi, G., Pakenham, K. I., Giovannetti, A. M., Presti, G., Boccolini, G., Cola, A., Grandi, S., & Tossani, E. (2021). Italian validation of the Italian Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 21, 57–65. https://doi.org/gkfw2p

Magalhães, C., Carraça, B., & de Mato, M. G. (2020). Mindfulness, self-compassion and psychological flexibility on adolescence. Em T. A. Carvalho (Ed.), What to know about mindfulness (pp. 119–138). Nova Science Publishers.

Marôco, J. (2018). Análise estatística com o SPSS statistics (7ª edição). ReportNumber.

Matos, M., Albuquerque, I., Galhardo, A., Cunha,M., Pedroso Lima, M., Palmeira, L., Petrocchi, N., McEwan, K., Maratos, F.,& Gilbert, P. (2022). Nurturing compassion in schools: A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a compassionate mind training program for teachers. PLOS One, 17(3), Artigo e0263480. https://doi.org/kbkw

Monteiro, F., Fonseca, A., Pereira, M., & Canavarro, M. C. (2020). Measuring positive mental health in the postpartum period: The bifactor structure of the mental health continuum–short form in Portuguese women. Assessment, 28(5), 1434–1444. https://doi.org/jz9m

Oliveira, S., Cunha, M., Rosado, A., & Ferreira, C. (2021). PLAYwithHEART: Study protocol to test the efficacy of a mindfulness, acceptance and compassion-based programme for adolescent athletes. Psychologica, 64(2), 65–86. https://doi.org/jv9t

Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS program (6ª ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Pinto-Gouveia, J., Carvalho, S., Palmeira, L., Castilho, P., Duarte, C., Ferreira, C., Duarte, J., Cunha, M., Matos, M., & Costa, J. (2017). BEfree: A new psychological program for binge eating that integrates psychoeducation, mindfulness and compassion. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 24, 1090–1098. https://doi.org/gfwj68

Robinson, A., Divers, R., Moscardini, E., & Calamia, M. (2021). Perfectionism, conscientiousness, and neuroticism: Does age matter? Personality and Individual Differences, 172, Artigo 110563. https://doi.org/ghqvdr

Rochefort, C., Baldwin, A. S., & Chmielewski, M. (2017). Experiential avoidance: An examination of the construct validity of the AAQ-II and MEAQ. Behavior Therapy, 49(3), 435–449. https://doi.org/gdkh2w

Rolffs, J. L., Rogge, R. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2016). Disentangling components of flexibility via the hexaflex model: Development and validation of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI). Assessment, 25(4), 458–482. https://doi.org/gdmhtg

Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), Artigo 26. https://doi.org/gfz8r6

Schumacher, L. M., Ferrer, R. A., & Green, P. A. (2019). The relationship between psychological flexibility and emotional distress in patients with cancer: A systematic review. Psycho-Oncology, 28(8), 1393–1404. https://doi.org/jz9n

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistic (5ª ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

Thomas, K. N., Bardeen, J. R., Witte, T. K., Rogers, T. A., Benfer, N., & Clauss, K. (2022). An examination of the factor structure of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory. Assessment, 29(8), 1714–1729. https://doi.org/jv9v

Wolgast, M. (2014). What does the acceptance and action questionnaire (AAQ-II) really measure? Behavior Therapy, 45(6), 831–839. https://doi.org/f2472c