Cyberstalking nos relacionamentos românticos: revisão sistemática da literatura

Anna Dhara Guimarães Tannuss; Patrícia  Nunes da Fonseca; Sara Janine Silva de Oliveira Souza; Lays Brunnyeli Santos de Oliveira

doi:10.31211/rpics.2024.10.1.320

Authors

Anna Dhara Guimarães Tannuss Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Departamento de Psicologia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6945-4041
Patrícia Nunes da Fonseca Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Departamento de Psicologia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6322-6336
Sara Janine Silva de Oliveira Souza Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Departamento de Psicologia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3658-0137
Lays Brunnyeli Santos de Oliveira Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Departamento de Psicologia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1196-6014

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2024.10.1.320

Keywords:

Cyberstalking, Internet, Intimate Partner, Romantic Relationships, Violence, Systematic Review

Abstract

Background and Objective: Cyberstalking in romantic relationships refers to the use of information and communication technologies, such as social networks, to stalk, threaten, or harass a current, former, or potential intimate partner. This review aimed to map empirical studies on the phenomenon, providing theoretical contextualization and identifying potential correlates. Considering the impacts on the mental health of the victims, this review also sought to identify articles that integrated concepts from psychology. Methods: Relevant articles were systematically searched in the databases of Portal Periódicos CAPES, Web of Science, PubMed, SciVerse Scopus, and Embase from 2012 to 2021. The quality of the studies was evaluated. Results: Out of 2,556 files identified, 19 studies met the eligibility criteria. Sixteen studies showed high quality, indicating robust evidence and low risk of bias, while three studies had moderate quality. The studies suggest that the bidirectionality and underlying motivations of cyberstalking are shaped by technological, sociocultural, and individual factors. Specifically, these motivations can be understood through sociodemographic variables and psychological theories. Furthermore, it was found that victims avoid reporting the crime. No contributions were found regarding the role of psychologists in supporting victims, perpetrators, and society. Conclusions: Overall, it is expected that the findings can guide intervention strategies in social, legal, and virtual realms in order to mitigate stalking behaviors, especially in the early stages of romantic relationships.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–88. https://doi.org/dzj574

Agostini, M. D., Zanin, C. A. da S., Moro, C. D., Czismoski, D. F., Giacometti, E. de, Oliveira, J. C. S. D., Basso, T. R. S., & Algeri, V. (2021). Representações sociais sobre relacionamento abusivo. Brazilian Journal of Development, 7(2), 20701–20721. https://doi.org/ggw7

Ahlgrim, B., & Terrance, C. (2021). Perceptions of cyberstalking: Impact of perpetrator gender and cyberstalker/victim relationship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(7–8), NP4074–NP4093. https://doi.org/gj2jvh

Almeida, K. R. de, & Zaganelli, M. V. (2021). Cyberstalking: do enquadramento atual à necessidade de tutela específica: Uma análise à luz do ordenamento jurídico brasileiro e do direito comparado. Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito, 31(1), Artigo 1. https://doi.org/10.9771/rppgd.v31i1.36359

Bhogal, M. S., Rhead, C., & Tudor, C. (2019). Understanding digital dating abuse from an evolutionary perspective: Further evidence for the role of mate value discrepancy. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, Artigo 109552. https://doi.org/gn7zhq

Bocij, P., & McFarlane, L. (2003). Cyberstalking: The technology of hate. The Police Journal, 76(3), 204–221.https://doi.org/bmhmmf

Bracewell, K., Hargreaves, P., & Stanley, N. (2022). The consequences of the CoViD-19 lockdown on stalking victimisation. Journal of Family Violence, 37(6), 951–957. https://doi.org/k9r4

Branson, M., & March, E. (2021). Dangerous dating in the digital age: Jealousy, hostility, narcissism, and psychopathy as predictors of cyber dating abuse. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, Artigo 106711. https://doi.org/k9r5

Celsi, L., Paleari, F. G., & Fincham, F. D. (2021). Adverse childhood experiences and early maladaptive schemas as predictors of cyber dating abuse: An actor-partner interdependence mediation model approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/gs5332

Cirino, M. K. M., Lopes, G. M. D. S., & Gusmão, A. L. F. (2022). Reflexões sobre o crime de stalking no Brasil: Uma ameaça à liberdade e à privacidade. http://bit.ly/3xMJzAR

Cook, D. J., Mulrow, C. D., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126(5), 376–380. https://doi.org/n7r

Curry, T. R., & Zavala, E. (2020). A multi-theoretical perspective on cyber dating abuse victimization and perpetration within intimate relationships: A Test of general strain, social learning, and self-control theories. Victims & Offenders, 15(4), 499–519. https://doi.org/k9r6

Deans, H., & Bhogal, M. S. (2019). Perpetrating cyber dating abuse: A brief report on the role of aggression, romantic jealousy and gender. Current Psychology, 38(5), 1077–1082. https://doi.org/gcx9dv

Duerksen, K. N., & Woodin, E. M. (2021). Cyber dating abuse victimization: Links with psychosocial functioning. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(19–20), NP10077–NP10105. https://doi.org/k9r7

Fissel, E. R. (2021). The reporting and help-seeking behaviors of cyberstalking victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(11–12), 5075–5100. https://doi.org/k9r8

Fornasier, M. O., Spinato, T.P., & Ribeiro, F. L. (2022). Cyberstalking: perseguição, privacidade e suas consequências no ambiente de rede. Revista do Mestrado em Direito da UCB, 1–28. http://bit.ly/4aITV3e

Galvão, M. C. B., & Ricarte, I. L. M. (2019). Revisão sistemática da literatura: Conceituação, produção e publicação. Logeion: Filosofia da Informação, 6(1), Artigo 1. https://doi.org/gmg9gb

Hamin, Z., & Rosli, W. R. W. (2018). Cloaked by cyber space: A legal response to the risks of cyber stalking in Malaysia. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 12, 316. https://doi.org/mscd

Kaur, P., Dhir, A., Tandon, A., Alzeiby, E. A., & Abohassan, A. A. (2021). A systematic literature review on cyberstalking. An analysis of past achievements and future promises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, Artigo 120426. https://doi.org/gj2jvk

Lancaster, M., Seibert, G. S., Cooper, A. N., May, R. W., & Fincham, F. (2020). Relationship quality in the context of cyber dating abuse: The role of attachment. Journal of Family Issues, 41(6), 739–758.https://doi.org/k9r9

Lei n.º 12.965, de 23 de abril (2014). Estabelece princípios, garantias, direitos e deveres para o uso da Internet no Brasil. Presidência da República. https://bit.ly/3JYisp0

Lei n.º 14.132, de 31 de março (2021). Acrescenta o art. 147-A ao Decreto-Lei nº 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940 (Código Penal), para prever o crime de perseguição; e revoga o art. 65 do Decreto-Lei nº 3.688, de 3 de outubro de 1941 (Lei das Contravenções Penais). Presidência da República. https://bit.ly/3yfAEIq

Lee, B. H., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2014). The ex-factor: Characteristics of online and offline post-relationship contact and tracking among Canadian emerging adults. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 23(2), 96–105. https://doi.org/gj2jxh

March, E., Litten, V., Sullivan, D. H., & Ward, L. (2020). Somebody that I (used to) know: Gender and dimensions of dark personality traits as predictors of intimate partner cyberstalking. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, Artigo 110084. https://doi.org/gj2jvv

March, E., Grieve, R., Clancy, E., Klettke, B., van Dick, R., & Hernandez Bark, A. S. (2021). The role of individual differences in cyber dating abuse perpetration. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 24(7), 457–463. https://doi.org/gpbwvp

Marcum, C. D., & Higgins, G. E. (2019). Examining the effectiveness of academic scholarship on the fight against cyberbullying and cyberstalking. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 44(4), 645–655. https://doi.org/ghqrdw

Marcum, C. D., Higgins, G. E., & Nicholson, J. (2017). I’m watching you: Cyberstalking behaviors of university students in romantic relationships. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(2), 373–388. https://doi.org/gf64j5

Marcum, C. D., Higgins, G. E., & Nicholson, J. (2018). Crossing boundaries online in romantic relationships: An exploratory study of the perceptions of impact on partners by cyberstalking offenders. Deviant Behavior, 39(6), 716–731. https://doi.org/gj2jw4

Meinero, F. S., & Dalzotto, J. V. (2021). A responsabilidade civil dos provedores de internet nos casos de pornografia de vingança. Revista de Direito, 13(01), Artigo 01. https://doi.org/mv2f

Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., & PRISMA-P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), Artigo 1. https://doi.org/gcsk56

Munn, Z., Moola, S., Lisy, K., Riitano D., & Tufanaru, C. (2020). Chapter 5: Systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Adelaide: The Joanna Briggs Institute. https://doi.org/msch

Paulin, M., & Boon, S. D. (2021). Revenge via social media and relationship contexts: Prevalence and measurement. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(12), 3692–3712. https://doi.org/k9sb

Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., McInerney, P., Soares, C. B., Khalil, H., & Parker, D. (2015). The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews. Adelaide: The Joanna Briggs Institute. http://bit.ly/4dkrzOD

Ramos, M. C., Miller, K. F., Moss, I. K., & Margolin, G. (2021). Perspective-taking and empathy mitigate family-of-origin risk for electronic aggression perpetration toward dating partners: A brief report. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(3–4), NP1155-1164NP. https://doi.org/k9sc

Rubio-Laborda, J. F., Almansa-Martínez, P., & Pastor-Bravo, M. del M. (2021). Relaciones sexistas en la generación X y Millennials. Atención Primaria, 53(4), Artigo 101992. https://doi.org/gjg65f

Silva, P., Fonsêca, P., Medeiros, E., Couto, R., & Pereira, R. (2021). Intimate Partner Cyberstalking Scale (IPCS): Evidências psicométricas no Brasil. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 59(2), 5–17. https://doi.org/k9st

Smoker, M., & March, E. (2017). Predicting perpetration of intimate partner cyberstalking: Gender and the dark tetrad. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 390–396. https://doi.org/ggwsj6

Víllora, B., Navarro, R., Yubero, S., Víllora, B., Navarro, R., & Yubero, S. (2019). Abuso online en el noviazgo y su relación con el abuso del móvil, la aceptación de la violencia y los mitos sobre el amor. Suma Psicológica, 26(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/k9sv

White, W. E., & Carmody, D. (2018). Preventing online victimization: College students’ views on intervention and prevention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(14), 2291–2307. https://doi.org/gdq778

Xu, Y., Wang, M., Chen, D., Jiang, X., & Xiong, Z. (2022). Inflammatory biomarkers in older adults with frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 34(5), 971–987. https://doi.org/k9sw